Source mapping your team can review
We agree the input formats, field transformations and record identifiers. Use the DDS preparation worksheet to show what you already collect and where evidence arrives separately.
Connect your EUDR data, reviews and submissions.
InvariTech scopes and builds EUDR workflows around your existing files and systems: input validation, human approval, TRACES integration and submission records your team can reconcile.
Tell us which systems hold your data, your expected workload and where preparation or submission gets stuck.
EUDR submission work we have built
InvariTech built Baldwin Global Consulting’s EUDR submission integration for European publishing supply chains: agreed-input validation, DDS preparation, submission-response records and visible exceptions. The case study describes the delivered work; additional client-management workflows are scoped separately.
See the Baldwin integration case studyWhat we build for you
We agree the work packages, acceptance tests and exclusions in your proposal. Each package has an output your team can review.
Validation and human review
Build checks for required information, agreed formats and duplicate records. Define blocking issues, reviewers and approval states. Technical validation and the operator’s compliance decision remain separate.
Submission and reconciliation
Connect the agreed TRACES filing route, retain request outcomes and associate issued identifiers with the source record. Uncertain responses need reconciliation before retrying, so interrupted requests do not disappear into a generic error queue.
Acceptance tests and handover
Test source-to-outcome behaviour, corrections and interrupted connections. Deliver agreed operating instructions, exception ownership and access-administration procedures. Define monitoring and post-launch support in the proposal.
A good fit when…
- Your product and supplier data already exists, but preparation crosses files and systems.
- Manual submissions and response checks are becoming repeated operational work.
- You can nominate the people who own evidence, review decisions and system access.
What to agree before we start
Your business owns source accuracy and the compliance decision. We build and test the agreed system behaviour. Legal advice, supplier investigations and managed compliance operations are separate services, not implied by an integration.
Confirm which obligations apply before choosing the filing route. If you act for other operators, we also scope multi-client access and submission authority.
From first conversation to handover
Trace a representative record
Review source formats, legal entities, approvals and the required outcome. Identify missing inputs and dependencies before choosing the integration design.
Build and test the workflow
Agree the proposal and acceptance criteria. Test routine records, missing data, rejected requests and uncertain outcomes in the appropriate test environment.
Approve the production handover
Review the acceptance results, production access and exception procedures. Name the operating owners and agree support before launch.
How we price the work
We prepare a scoped proposal rather than price by statement count alone. Source formats, data readiness, legal entities, approval steps, integrations and failure handling all affect the work.
The proposal distinguishes the initial build, any migration, third-party operating costs and ongoing support. Deployment and security requirements belong in that scope. Timing depends on sample data, access and review availability as well as development.
Before you get in touch
Do we need to replace our existing systems?
The starting point is your current workflow. We assess an agreed file handoff or API connection before proposing replacement software. The scope specifies what stays, what connects and what needs building.
Can you handle the TRACES API integration?
Yes, we scope the connection alongside validation, response handling and reconciliation. Our TRACES API guide explains the technical considerations. Acceptance and production setup remain separate; current access requirements must be confirmed for your connection.
What should we prepare for the first conversation?
A short process description, the systems involved, approximate workload and any fixed deadline. Identify who owns evidence and approvals. We can agree how to share redacted samples after that conversation; do not put confidential records or credentials in the enquiry form.
Make the next EUDR handoff a defined build.
Tell us which systems hold your data, your expected workload and where preparation or submission gets stuck. We’ll use that to discuss fit and the information needed for a scoped proposal.
Start with a short description. Please don’t send credentials or confidential records through the contact form.